A: I feel like the best approaches for assessing the three components of fluency (accuracy, reading speed, and prosody) are running records, fluency checks, and informal reading inventories, There were on page 85 of the Tompkins reading and along side it there was the recommended grade level for each assessments. Running records help to calculate the percentage of words the student reads correctly and from this you can analyze any errors made. After the student reads out loud and the teacher makes marks on her copy of the story, you can identify if the material was too easy, to hard, or appropriate for the student. There are also ways for the teacher to categorize any mistakes the student made by asking specific questions listed on page 86. Although running records are the most useful, teachers can also use IRI’s. There are two parts to this test: graded word lists and passages. The students read the words until it is too difficult for the, which helps the teacher to figure out where the student should begin with the passage. After completing the passage the students need to answer questions. To test fluency, it is necessary to have the students read out loud. I believe the students’ word identification is more developed than from when I started, so it’s developing well. Each student has received word rings with specific sight words. They are tested on these sight words from week to week and when they can correctly identify each word they move up to the next color level. Majority of the students have increased a lot from the beginning of the school year and some have passed all of the sight words for 1st grade already. Some students still have trouble with things like short/long vowels, magic letters, or words that don’t follow the same patterns as others. As for fluency, many of the students have increased in that as well, but sometimes I think the students just have the books memorized because they have read them so many times. However, once my CT feels its time for them to move on to a higher level, they are once again challenged but I believe most of the students fluency has increased. Many students have a better word recognition now than they did at the beginning of the school year so they can get through reading more fluently. As for my focus student, she transferred to the school so I don’t know where she was at before she came to our class, but she is at an appropriate level for her age and seems to do well when not distracted.
B: My book, Number the Stars, is at too high of a level for my placement classroom. I think for this book, I would focus on comprehension. “Some comprehension strategies can be important to a reader because they have the potential to provide access to knowledge that is removed from personal experience (Stahl).” Although I don’t believe that this book will directly relate to the students, I think that some situations they are in could possibly trigger something that has happened in their life that was similar to something in the book.
I would read a chapter to the class each day, and then have the students create a story map about what happened. The story map was talked about in the Stahl reading and the students seemed to do well with this. I would also meet with the students individually and see if they could retell the story. It might be better to read a few chapters at a time to separate groups of students at different times of the day and have the complete the map and retell directly after instead of trying to assess the entire class at once. If I had an older group of kids (higher el) I would begin with guided practice, then have them create/use a story map to guide their learning and retell. I would also do reciprocal teaching, where students take turns leading discussion and asking questions. I would do this in small groups.